Why Did Christ Descend into Hell? The Salvation of the Old Testament Faithful

Christ was without sin and he fully paid the price of our redemption on the cross. So if Christ’s suffering was finished on the cross, why did His human soul descend into hell?

Screen Shot 2014-04-21 at 10.15.19 AM

First we must confer with Saint Thomas Aquinas and other saints and doctors who divide hell (infernus) into four abodes:

  1. Purgatory (abode of those being purified)
  2. Limbo of the Fathers (abode of the Old Testament faithful – now it’s empty)
  3. Limbo of the Children (abode for unbaptized children under the age of reason)
  4. Gehenna (abode of the damned)

Usually when we speak of “hell” we mean “the fires of hell” or Gehenna. At STh III, q. 52, a. 2, Saint Thomas Aquinas is clear that Christ did not descend into Gehenna. (For those interested in such things, Hans Urs Von Balthasar stands if full contradiction to Catholic tradition on this point.)

Christ’s soul descended to the Limbo of the Fathers, also known as Abraham’s Bosom:

“And it came to pass that the beggar died and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom. And the rich man also died: and he was buried in hell.” (Luke 16:22, D-R)

In the Old Testament, the gates of Heaven were not open to human souls. So the faithful in the Old Testament remained in the Limbo of the Fathers until the passion and death of Christ – those from Adam till even the thief on the cross.

Now Saint Thomas Aquinas teaches that since the Old Testament faithful did not have the sacraments, that Christ’s descent into the inferno was for them as the sacraments are to us:

Hence, as the power of the Passion is applied to the living through the sacraments which make us like unto Christ’s Passion, so likewise it is applied to the dead through His descent into hell. On which account it is written (Zechariah 9:11) that “He sent forth prisoners out of the pit, in the blood of His testament,” that is, by the power of His Passion.

So Abraham was not baptized, but he did receive the efficacy of baptism by the descent of Christ into the Limbo of the Fathers. Thus, the doctrine of Christ’s descent into Hell solves many theological difficulties: the lack of sacramental efficacy in the Old Law, the salvation of people before Christ, and the distinction of abodes in hell.

Want to learn more theology from Saint Thomas Aquinas while earning a Certificate in Theology? Please enroll at the New Saint Thomas Institute. The tuition is low and you can take all of our theological video lessons online with Dr. Taylor Marshall. Click here to learn more.

Download My Book for Free
Thomas Aquinas in 50 Pages
Over 15,000 copies downloaded! This is a quick and easy way to learn the basic philosophy and theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas. The Popes of the last 300 years have endorsed St Thomas Aquinas. Learn more through this accessible resources. Download it for free.

Comments Policy: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic. If your comment contains a hyperlink to another site, your comment automatically goes into "Comments Purgatory" where it waits for release by way of moderation.

  • Norman

    So chances are decent that he may have gone to get the unbaptized under the age of reason as well, while still not visiting the damned, do I follow correctly?

    • It comes back to having sanctifying grace in the soul.

      If someone had sanctifying grace in the soul, then they were liberated from Sheol.

      Thomas Aquinas says that infants prior to baptism were released of original sin through two ways:

      baby presentation/dedication to God

      If a person before Christ held up their baby to God and presented the infant to God, that would do it.

      This begs the question. Could this be sufficient in the New Testament? Could a Catholic mother do this with her baby in the womb?

      Cardinal Cajetan said yes, but he got in trouble with the Pope for it.

      • Norman

        Awesome, Thanks Dr. Marshall (and FYI, I kan’t be much of a fan of Kant either– couldn’t stand that two people could be talking, disagree as to whether or not the conversation they’re in exists, and both be right- might sound great on paper to some, but sounds silly if you’re having a conversation about it)… As for the Catholic Mother with the child in the womb offering it up to God, I would think that the child could be saved until it reached the age of reason- am I right???

        Why I would think that is because I’ve been told (but would like to double check with you) that God is bigger and more powerful than His Sacraments. On the other hand, God exercises his power through the sacraments so I’d love to hear whether or not I’m right, and why even if I’m not!